StrengthenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Workers at oil refineries who deal with a specific gas additive are getting sick, so the expert thinks everyone will start getting those same symptoms when that gas becomes common.

Conclusion: The general public will likely experience more headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath once MBTE gasoline is widely used.

Reasoning: Workers who handle MBTE currently report a high number of these specific health complaints.

Analysis: The toxicologist is making a leap from a specific group (refinery workers) to the general population. To strengthen this, we need to assume that the exposure levels for the public will be sufficient to cause the same symptoms seen in the workers. Since this is a 'Strengthen EXCEPT' question, four choices will bolster this link—perhaps by ruling out other chemicals at the refinery—while the correct answer will either weaken the argument, be irrelevant, or provide no support at all.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

Each of the following, if true, strengthens the toxicologist's argument EXCEPT:

Correct Answer
B
B highlights that the symptoms are among those of serious medical conditions. That may raise concern about public health, but it does not support the claim that MBTE will cause an increased incidence of these symptoms. It speaks to severity, not to causation or frequency, so it does not strengthen the argument.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep