Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Some teachers think grades are necessary for learning, but the author argues that since the most motivated kids don't need them and the least motivated kids don't care about them, grades are useless.

Conclusion: The incentive of grades does not serve any essential academic purpose.

Reasoning: Students who are highly interested in a subject will learn regardless of grades, while students who have no interest at all are not motivated by them.

Analysis: The author commits a classic error by only considering the extreme ends of the student spectrum. While it may be true that the 'intensely interested' and the 'completely uninterested' are unaffected by grades, the argument ignores the vast middle ground of average students. These students might not be naturally passionate about every subject but are motivated to study specifically to earn a good grade. Look for an answer that identifies this failure to consider a group that falls between these two extremes.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

11.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

Correct Answer
E
Correct. The argument overlooks students who are neither highly interested nor completely indifferent, who may be moved by the incentive of grades. This gap undermines the conclusion that grades serve no essential academic purpose.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep