Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: If science convinces everyone that we aren't actually in control of our own behavior, we will stop feeling guilty when we do bad things, which will eventually destroy society's moral fabric.

Conclusion: Believing that humans are merely natural objects controlled by external forces will inevitably cause a decline in general morality.

Reasoning: A lack of belief in personal responsibility prevents people from feeling shame for immoral acts, and a lack of shame leads to a breakdown in societal morals.

Analysis: The historian provides a logical chain: No Responsibility → No Shame → Moral Decline. However, the conclusion introduces a new concept: 'theories that regard humans as natural objects subject to forces outside their control.' To make this argument airtight, we must bridge the gap between being a 'natural object' and having 'no responsibility.' We are looking for an assumption that explicitly links these two ideas. If we assume that being subject to external forces means one is not responsible for their actions, the conclusion follows perfectly.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

9.

The conclusion drawn by the cultural historian follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Correct Answer
B
B supplies the missing link: if people regard themselves only as natural objects, they lose their sense of responsibility. With universal acceptance, that lack of responsibility belief becomes widespread, triggering the stated chain to moral decline.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep