Point at IssueDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Hazel thinks going digital will boost the company's bottom line through efficiency, but Max thinks it will alienate customers and hurt profits.

Conclusion: Hazel concludes that the business should switch to electronic order processing to increase profits, while Max concludes that doing so would cause the business to lose money.

Reasoning: Hazel believes electronic processing is faster and more accurate; Max believes customers will find it cold and inhuman, leading to fewer customers.

Analysis: To identify the point at issue, we apply the 'Agree/Disagree' test to the speakers' claims. Hazel explicitly argues that the switch will 'increase profits,' whereas Max directly contradicts this by stating the business would 'lose money.' While they also discuss customer preferences and processing speed, those are merely the reasons supporting their primary disagreement. The core of their conflict is the financial impact of switching to electronic order processing. Look for an answer choice that focuses on whether the proposed change would be profitable.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

Hazel and Max disagree over whether

Correct Answer
C
Hazel claims switching to electronic processing would increase profits; Max claims it would cause them to lose money. They directly disagree on the financial effect of switching to electronic processing.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep