Passage Summary: Art experts claim they can tell if a painting is real based on how it makes them feel. However, since feelings are subjective and vary between people, the author thinks these experts are full of it.

Conclusion: A connoisseur's assessment of a painting's authenticity cannot be trusted.

Reasoning: The emotional impact of art varies significantly from person to person, yet connoisseurs rely on this subjective impact to determine if a work is authentic.

Analysis: The author makes a massive leap from 'subjectivity' to a 'complete lack of credibility.' Just because a metric is subjective doesn't mean it's useless or that an expert's trained emotional response isn't a reliable indicator of style. You should look for an answer that points out the author ignores the possibility that a connoisseur's specific emotional reaction might still be a consistent and accurate tool for identification despite general variability. It's a classic case of dismissing a method entirely just because it isn't perfectly uniform across all humans.