ParadoxDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Bosses say they love hard workers, but when hard workers get laid off, they actually have a harder time finding a new job than the slackers do.

Reasoning: Companies claim to value conscientiousness in employees, yet a study shows that laid-off workers with this trait take longer to find new jobs than their less responsible peers.

Analysis: This is a 'Resolve the Paradox' question with an 'EXCEPT' twist, meaning four choices will explain the discrepancy and one will not. The conflict is between what firms say they want and the actual hiring outcomes for conscientious people. To resolve this, we need information that explains why being a 'good' employee might actually hinder a job search—perhaps they are more selective, or perhaps their previous high salaries make them harder to rehire. The incorrect answer (the one we want) will likely be irrelevant or even deepen the mystery by making the conscientious workers seem even more attractive to employers.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

8.

Each of the following, if true, helps to resolve the apparent paradox above EXCEPT:

Correct Answer
A
A doesn’t address the individual likelihood of finding a job within five months; it only says there are more shirkers in the market. More shirkers doesn’t explain why, per person, shirkers would land jobs faster than conscientious candidates.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep