ParadoxDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Usually, seat belt laws save lives, but in one specific city, the number of traffic deaths stayed exactly the same even after the law was passed.

Reasoning: A safety report indicates that seat belt laws usually reduce traffic deaths by 7 percent, yet a specific city saw no change in its death rate after two years of such laws.

Analysis: We are looking for the one answer choice that does not explain why deaths stayed the same despite the new law. To resolve the paradox, we need a reason why this city is an outlier—perhaps traffic increased significantly, or the law isn't being enforced. The 'Except' format means four choices will offer a plausible explanation, such as a rise in high-speed accidents offsetting the seat belt benefits. The correct answer will likely be irrelevant to the death rate or even deepen the mystery.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

17.

Which one of the following, if true, does NOT help resolve the apparent discrepancy between the safety report and the city's public safety records?

Correct Answer
E
Saying most people killed weren’t wearing seat belts does not explain the stable overall death total. That fact is common even when seat belts reduce fatalities, since non-wearers are disproportionately represented among decedents. It doesn’t address enforcement levels, overall compliance, changed counting, or offsetting risk increases.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep