Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: People often think chocolate gives them pimples, but it might actually be that stress causes both the pimples and the chocolate cravings at the same time.

Conclusion: The common belief that chocolate causes acne is likely a mistaken interpretation of a correlation.

Reasoning: Scientific evidence suggests that stress causes acne and that people under stress tend to consume more chocolate.

Analysis: This argument employs a specific strategy of offering an alternative explanation for a correlation. The author identifies a perceived cause-and-effect relationship and introduces a third variable—stress—that accounts for both phenomena. To identify the correct answer, look for a description of how the author reinterprets the evidence to suggest that the 'cause' and 'effect' are actually both effects of a different underlying factor. This is a classic move to undermine a causal claim without denying the observed data.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

The argument employs which one of the following argumentative strategies?

Correct Answer
B
The argument provides additional evidence (studies on stress causing acne and evidence about stress increasing chocolate consumption) that supports an alternative interpretation of the same observations, undermining the claim that chocolate causes acne.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep