Flawed ReasoningDiff: Easy
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: An actor who played a TV lawyer died, and a real lawyer said it felt like losing one of their own. The author concludes this means the lawyer actually thinks the actor was a real attorney.
Conclusion: Some legal professionals are losing the ability to tell the difference between fictional characters and real people.
Reasoning: A lawyer remarked that the death of an actor who played a famous TV attorney felt like the loss of a real colleague.
Analysis: The author is being remarkably dense here, failing to recognize a common metaphorical tribute. The lawyer isn't literally claiming the actor passed the bar exam; they are expressing professional respect for the authenticity of the performance. The flaw lies in taking a figurative expression of sentiment and interpreting it as a literal statement of fact. It’s a bit like hearing someone say they’re 'starving' and calling an ambulance for clinical malnutrition. Look for an answer that identifies this confusion between metaphorical language and literal belief.
Conclusion: Some legal professionals are losing the ability to tell the difference between fictional characters and real people.
Reasoning: A lawyer remarked that the death of an actor who played a famous TV attorney felt like the loss of a real colleague.
Analysis: The author is being remarkably dense here, failing to recognize a common metaphorical tribute. The lawyer isn't literally claiming the actor passed the bar exam; they are expressing professional respect for the authenticity of the performance. The flaw lies in taking a figurative expression of sentiment and interpreting it as a literal statement of fact. It’s a bit like hearing someone say they’re 'starving' and calling an ambulance for clinical malnutrition. Look for an answer that identifies this confusion between metaphorical language and literal belief.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage2.The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
Correct Answer
E
The argument overlooks that the lawyer explicitly says Burr was not a lawyer and uses figurative language (“as if”), which indicates awareness of the fiction–reality distinction. Ignoring that qualifier creates the flawed inference.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal