ParadoxDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Students have very different opinions on using computers for school; they love them for math but think they are useless for learning how to read and write.

Reasoning: While computer programs are highly effective for teaching arithmetic, they are significantly less effective for science and entirely ineffective for reading and writing.

Analysis: To resolve this paradox, we need to find a reason why computers are great for one subject but terrible for others. The discrepancy suggests that the nature of the subject matter dictates the success of the technology. Perhaps math is just more 'computer-friendly' because it relies on rigid rules, whereas writing requires a human soul—or at least a human grader. Look for an answer choice that explains why certain skills are harder to teach through a digital interface than others.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the students' mixed reactions?

Correct Answer
B
B directly explains the pattern: among the listed disciplines, arithmetic’s exactness makes it most suitable for computer-assisted education. That neatly accounts for computers being very useful in arithmetic, only a little helpful in science, and of no help in reading/writing, which are much less exact and more open-ended.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep