Passage Summary: A school's rules say it must have students with special needs. Because no one with a learning disability is enrolled, the author claims the school is breaking the rules.

Conclusion: Westside School is currently in violation of its charter requirements.

Reasoning: The charter requires students with special educational needs, but the school has no students with learning disabilities.

Analysis: This argument suffers from a classic 'category vs. subset' gap. The author assumes that 'learning disabilities' is the only category that satisfies 'special educational needs.' To make this conclusion logically bulletproof, we need an assumption that bridges this gap. Look for an answer that states that students with learning disabilities are the only students who could possibly fulfill the 'special educational needs' requirement. Without that link, the school could easily have students with other types of special needs and be perfectly compliant.