Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: The manager believes the company won't make any money from a new process because the machines are expensive and the daily operations cost more than the current ones.

Conclusion: Adopting the new sulfur-reducing process will result in no profit for the company.

Reasoning: The manager points to the high cost of purchasing equipment and the increased cost of running the process due to the need for reheating.

Analysis: The manager's argument suffers from a common financial oversight: equating high costs with a lack of profit. Profit is determined by the relationship between costs and revenue. The manager ignores the possibility that the new process could increase revenue—perhaps through higher efficiency, a better product, or avoiding environmental fines—which could outweigh the higher expenses. Look for an answer that identifies this failure to consider potential increases in income or other financial benefits.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

14.

The plant manager's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

Correct Answer
A
Correct. The manager reaches a conclusion about overall profitability while considering only some factors (purchase/installation costs and reheating), ignoring other relevant ones like fuel-efficiency savings that could significantly affect running costs.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep