StrengthenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Big space missions have been failing and wasting a lot of money lately, so we should stop doing them and try doing many smaller missions instead.

Conclusion: Grand space projects should be replaced by a series of smaller-scale projects.

Reasoning: Large-scale space initiatives have recently experienced several failures and significant financial losses.

Analysis: The argument relies on the assumption that smaller projects will not suffer from the same financial and technical pitfalls that plagued the larger ones. To strengthen this claim, we need to find evidence that small projects are inherently more stable or that their failures are less catastrophic. Look for an answer choice that highlights a specific advantage of small projects, such as lower risk or greater cost-efficiency, that large projects lack.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

3.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the most support for the reasoning above?

Correct Answer
C
C directly bridges the gap by stating that large projects are more likely to fail and are more financially risky than small ones, which supports abandoning large projects for smaller ones given recent costly setbacks.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep