StrengthenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: In the 80s, Japanese art buyers bought a huge amount of Impressionist paintings, and the author believes they did this because they genuinely loved the way those specific paintings looked.

Conclusion: The high volume of Impressionist art purchases by Japanese collectors was driven by a specific preference for the visual style of those paintings.

Reasoning: During the 1980s, Japanese collectors were exceptionally active in buying 19th-century Impressionist works compared to other types of art.

Analysis: The argument provides a causal explanation (aesthetic preference) for a specific behavior (buying art). To strengthen this, we need to bolster the idea that it was the 'look' of the art that mattered, rather than external factors like investment value or social status. Look for an answer that shows Japanese collectors chose Impressionism even when other styles were more profitable, or perhaps that their preference for these specific aesthetics is reflected in other cultural areas. Eliminating alternative motives is a very effective way to make the author's preferred explanation more likely.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the explanation above?

Correct Answer
C
It directly links Impressionist techniques to Japanese prints that are highly esteemed in Japan. This makes it very plausible that Japanese collectors’ buying pattern was driven by a specific aesthetic preference, just as the explanation claims.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep