Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: Most people think they are smart about health, but because only a small group understands DNA, the author concludes that the vast majority are actually medically illiterate.
Conclusion: At least 80 percent of the population lacks the medical knowledge necessary to make informed personal or public health decisions.
Reasoning: Only 20 percent of the population understands DNA well enough to follow a news story, despite 90 percent believing they are well-informed.
Analysis: The author is guilty of a classic 'part-to-whole' flaw by assuming that DNA knowledge is the definitive metric for all medical understanding. While DNA is certainly a major topic, one could arguably make sound health choices or policy decisions without being an expert on genetics. You should look for an answer choice that points out this narrow focus or the lack of evidence connecting DNA literacy to general decision-making skills. It's a bit like saying someone can't drive a car just because they don't know how the fuel injection system works.
Conclusion: At least 80 percent of the population lacks the medical knowledge necessary to make informed personal or public health decisions.
Reasoning: Only 20 percent of the population understands DNA well enough to follow a news story, despite 90 percent believing they are well-informed.
Analysis: The author is guilty of a classic 'part-to-whole' flaw by assuming that DNA knowledge is the definitive metric for all medical understanding. While DNA is certainly a major topic, one could arguably make sound health choices or policy decisions without being an expert on genetics. You should look for an answer choice that points out this narrow focus or the lack of evidence connecting DNA literacy to general decision-making skills. It's a bit like saying someone can't drive a car just because they don't know how the fuel injection system works.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage2.The argument's reasoning is questionable because the argument fails to demonstrate that
Correct Answer
D
The argument needs the assumption that understanding DNA is essential to making well-informed medical choices or good policy decisions. D states exactly that missing requirement; without it, the 20% DNA figure doesn’t justify the 80% deficiency conclusion.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal