Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A rare owl only nests in one specific type of cactus in Baja; since all those cacti died recently, the owl won't be able to live there this winter unless the plants are brought back.

Conclusion: The dwarf masked owl will not reside on the Baja peninsula this winter unless the spiny cactus population is restored.

Reasoning: The owl requires spiny cacti for nesting, no other nesting sites exist on the peninsula, and a blight has destroyed the entire local cactus population.

Analysis: The argument identifies a lack of nesting sites and concludes the owl cannot live in the area at all. This relies on the 'Gap' that nesting is a non-negotiable requirement for the owl's winter residency. If the owl could survive the winter in Baja without nesting—perhaps by just hanging out on a rock—the conclusion would fall apart. We are looking for an assumption that confirms the owl must nest during its winter stay or that nesting is essential for it to 'make its home' there.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

The argument depends on assuming which one of the following?

Correct Answer
E
E states that suitable nesting sites must be present where the owl makes its winter home. This is the precise missing link. Given that the only suitable sites on Baja were spiny cacti and those are gone, the owl cannot winter there unless cacti are reestablished. Negation test: if suitable nesting sites need not be present where the owl winters, then the owl could still winter on Baja despite the cactus loss—destroying the argument.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep