Passage Summary: An ethicist says that doing good because you care is more impressive than doing good just because you're supposed to, even though you can't really control your feelings.

Reasoning: Acts of kindness are more praiseworthy when driven by compassion rather than just a sense of duty, despite the fact that emotions are involuntary while actions are choices.

Analysis: In a 'Must be False' question, we are looking for a statement that directly contradicts the established rules. The stimulus sets up a hierarchy: Compassion + Action > Duty + Action. It also notes a distinction between controllable actions and uncontrollable feelings. You should look for an answer choice that claims a duty-bound person is more praiseworthy than a compassionate one, or perhaps one that suggests we can choose our feelings. Anything that flips the ethicist's ranking is the target.