Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A new test finds tiny growths that might be cancer, so doctors cut them out just in case; since some of those growths weren't actually dangerous, the researcher says the test is causing unnecessary surgeries.

Conclusion: The new screening test can lead to dangerous surgeries that are not medically necessary.

Reasoning: The test identifies polyps at such an early stage that their malignancy is unknown, yet doctors often remove them anyway, even though some turn out to be harmless.

Analysis: The argument contains a gap between a polyp being 'not malignant' and the surgery being 'not medically necessary.' The researcher assumes that if a polyp isn't cancerous, removing it wasn't necessary. To be a 'Necessary Assumption,' the argument must believe that the potential risk of a polyp being malignant isn't enough, on its own, to justify the surgery as a medical necessity.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

13.

Which one of the following is an assumption that the medical researcher's argument requires?

Correct Answer
B
This ties the gap: if surgical removal of nonmalignant polyps detected by the test is not always medically necessary, then some prompted surgeries are indeed unnecessary. Negation test: if instead it were true that such removals are always medically necessary, then none of those surgeries would be unnecessary, collapsing the conclusion.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep