StrengthenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Since life's problems are messy and cross over different subjects, students should learn through mixed-subject classes rather than separate ones.

Conclusion: Schools should replace individual academic discipline courses with interdisciplinary courses.

Reasoning: Most real-world problems cannot be solved by using knowledge from a single academic field in isolation.

Analysis: The educator assumes that the best way to prepare for multi-disciplinary problem-solving is to learn in a multi-disciplinary environment. This is a significant leap; one could argue that you need a deep, isolated understanding of math and physics separately before you can effectively combine them to build a bridge. To strengthen this argument, look for an answer that confirms interdisciplinary courses are actually more effective at teaching students how to apply knowledge to real-world problems than traditional, single-subject courses are.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

2.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the educator's argument?

Correct Answer
C
It directly supports the missing link: if students who take only single-discipline courses are rarely able to combine knowledge across disciplines, then requiring interdisciplinary courses makes sense to prepare students for real-world, integrative problem-solving.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep