Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: We found cow bones in a dry area where no other big animals lived, even though people were there. Since wild cows would have needed water holes that attract all sorts of animals, these cows must have been raised by the people.

Conclusion: The bovines found in this arid region were domesticated, indicating that the local people were not just hunter-gatherers.

Reasoning: The region was dry and lacked other large mammals; since natural water sources would have attracted a variety of large animals, the bovines must have been provided water by humans.

Analysis: The argument relies on a 'Gap' between the absence of other animals and the conclusion of domestication. It assumes that if the water were natural, other large mammals would have inevitably left remains there. It also assumes that the bovines couldn't have survived on some resource that other large mammals couldn't use. Look for an answer that confirms the bovines' survival was dependent on human-controlled water or that other animals would have definitely been present if the water were naturally occurring.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

3.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Correct Answer
A
A supplies the needed bridge: absent natural water, wild (undomesticated) bovines are unlikely to be present. Negation test: if undomesticated bovines could survive without natural water, their presence wouldn’t imply domestication, undermining the conclusion.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep