StrengthenDiff: Hard
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: A dentist argues that putting fluoride in water doesn't really work because kids in Europe (where they don't do it) have better teeth than kids in the US (where they do).
Conclusion: Adding fluoride to water does not significantly help in preventing tooth decay.
Reasoning: Data from five studies show that children in non-fluoridated European regions actually have fewer dental issues than children in the fluoridated United States.
Analysis: The dentist is making a causal claim based on a broad correlation between two different geographic populations. To strengthen this, we need to eliminate 'confounding variables'—other reasons why Europeans might have better teeth, such as lower sugar intake or better overall dental hygiene habits. If we find out that these other factors are actually the same in both places, it makes the lack of fluoridation look like a more plausible explanation. Look for an answer that makes the two groups as similar as possible in every way except for the water they drink.
Conclusion: Adding fluoride to water does not significantly help in preventing tooth decay.
Reasoning: Data from five studies show that children in non-fluoridated European regions actually have fewer dental issues than children in the fluoridated United States.
Analysis: The dentist is making a causal claim based on a broad correlation between two different geographic populations. To strengthen this, we need to eliminate 'confounding variables'—other reasons why Europeans might have better teeth, such as lower sugar intake or better overall dental hygiene habits. If we find out that these other factors are actually the same in both places, it makes the lack of fluoridation look like a more plausible explanation. Look for an answer that makes the two groups as similar as possible in every way except for the water they drink.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage10.Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the dentist's argument?
Correct Answer
E
By stating that U.S. children’s diets are not generally worse for teeth than European children’s, (E) removes a major alternative explanation for the higher U.S. decay rates. With diet not to blame, the Europe-better pattern more credibly suggests that water fluoridation does not have a substantial preventive effect.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal