Point at IssueDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Babson thinks people will pay for good online articles because they are used to tipping for good service, but Cortez thinks the plan will fail because people aren't in the habit of paying for articles individually.

Reasoning: Babson argues that high quality will make a pay-per-article model successful, citing tipping as evidence of consumer behavior; Cortez argues that people only pay for what is customary, and since this isn't customary, it will fail.

Analysis: To identify the point at issue, we look for the specific claim that one person affirms and the other denies. Babson is the optimist here, believing the 'novel' idea will succeed based on the value of the content. Cortez is the skeptic, arguing that the lack of established custom is a 'bad sign' for the venture's success. The disagreement is fundamentally about whether this specific business model is likely to be profitable or successful. Use the 'Agree/Disagree' test: Babson would say 'Yes, it will succeed,' while Cortez would say 'No, it won't.'

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Babson and Cortez disagree over whether

Correct Answer
D
D captures their exact dispute. Babson explicitly uses tipping attitudes to argue that a $1-per-article model will succeed if quality is high. Cortez counters that tipping is tied to custom and that paying per article isn’t customary, so tipping attitudes do not indicate success here. Thus, they disagree about whether tipping behavior supports that optimistic conclusion.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep