Most Strongly SupportedDiff: Hard
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: After a nuclear accident, specific chemicals were found in the air, but heavy ones were missing. These chemicals come from either the fuel rods or the core. We know the fuel rods don't have tellurium, and we know a direct core blast would have released heavy stuff. However, steam was released, and it can carry the specific chemicals found.
Reasoning: The isotopes found (iodine, tellurium, cesium) are present in the core and soluble in steam, but the absence of heavy isotopes suggests the material was not ejected directly from the core; furthermore, tellurium is not found in spent fuel rods.
Analysis: In a 'Most Strongly Supported' task, we act like detectives combining clues. We know the material didn't come from the spent fuel because tellurium was present. We know it likely wasn't a direct 'ejection' from the core because the heavy isotopes were missing. However, we are told that steam contacted the core and that the core contains the three isotopes found, which are 'easily dissolved' by steam. The most logical synthesis is that the radioactive material was carried out of the core by the steam, rather than being blown out directly or coming from the fuel rods.
Reasoning: The isotopes found (iodine, tellurium, cesium) are present in the core and soluble in steam, but the absence of heavy isotopes suggests the material was not ejected directly from the core; furthermore, tellurium is not found in spent fuel rods.
Analysis: In a 'Most Strongly Supported' task, we act like detectives combining clues. We know the material didn't come from the spent fuel because tellurium was present. We know it likely wasn't a direct 'ejection' from the core because the heavy isotopes were missing. However, we are told that steam contacted the core and that the core contains the three isotopes found, which are 'easily dissolved' by steam. The most logical synthesis is that the radioactive material was carried out of the core by the steam, rather than being blown out directly or coming from the fuel rods.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage24.Of the following statements, which one is most strongly supported by the information above?
Correct Answer
B
Given that direct core ejection would include heavy isotopes (not observed) and spent rods don’t contain significant tellurium (yet tellurium was observed), the best-supported explanation is that steam contacting the core dissolved iodine, tellurium, and cesium and carried them into the atmosphere.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal