Passage Summary: A student thinks a ban on citing certain websites is a form of censorship. The professor argues that the ban is about academic reliability, not about what students are allowed to read.

Conclusion: The citation ban is unfair and constitutes censorship.

Reasoning: Students should have the freedom to read any source they choose for their research.

Analysis: This is a Point at Issue question, so we apply the 'Agree/Disagree Test.' The student claims the ban restricts what they can read, labeling it censorship, while the professor explicitly states that students are still allowed to read whatever they like. Therefore, the disagreement centers on whether the citation policy actually restricts the students' freedom to read or access information. Look for an answer that highlights this specific conflict regarding the scope of the department's rule.