Point at IssueDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Michele thinks companies should generally avoid database overhauls because they cause more problems than they are worth. Alvaro disagrees, arguing that those problems only happen if the job is done poorly, and suggests companies should simply ensure they do the job correctly.

Conclusion: No conclusion (Fact Set/Dialogue).

Reasoning: No reasoning (Fact Set/Dialogue).

Analysis: Michele and Alvaro are clashing over the wisdom of undertaking a database overhaul. Michele's stance is 'don't do it' (or at least be extremely skeptical), while Alvaro's stance is 'do it, just do it right.' They specifically disagree on whether the inherent risks of an overhaul make it a bad idea for a company to proceed. Use the Agree/Disagree test: Michele would agree that overhauls are usually not worth it, while Alvaro would disagree, blaming the failure on execution rather than the project itself.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

20.

Michele and Alvaro disagree with each other about which one of the following?

Correct Answer
D
D captures the direct clash: Michele’s advice is to think twice before proceeding, while Alvaro’s advice is to do the job right. They disagree about the recommended course for a company considering an overhaul.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep