Point at IssueDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Gabriella blames the government's interest rate policy for the bad economy, but Ivan thinks the government is innocent because the whole world's economy is struggling.

Conclusion: Gabriella concludes that government interest rate hikes slowed the economy, while Ivan concludes the slowdown was caused by global factors.

Reasoning: Gabriella argues that higher rates reduced borrowing and spending; Ivan argues that the domestic economy simply followed a broader global decline.

Analysis: To identify the point at issue, apply the 'Agree/Disagree' test to the cause of the economic slowdown. Gabriella explicitly links the slowdown to the government's interest rate hike, whereas Ivan explicitly denies this causal link, attributing the change to global trends instead. It is a classic case of two people looking at the same problem and pointing fingers at different culprits. Look for an answer that captures this specific disagreement over the primary cause of the domestic economic slump.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

11.

Gabriella and Ivan disagree about whether

Correct Answer
D
D states exactly the causal claim Gabriella asserts and Ivan denies: that raising interest rates caused the country’s economy to slow.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep