Point at IssueDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Sanchez thinks the school didn't overspend because the computers were cheap, but Merriweather thinks they overspent because they bought fancy models the school didn't actually need.

Reasoning: Sanchez focuses on the total cost being reasonable, while Merriweather argues the specific type of computers purchased was excessive for the school's requirements.

Analysis: The disagreement here centers on the definition of 'spending too much.' Sanchez looks at the price tag and sees a bargain, whereas Merriweather looks at the utility and sees waste. It’s the classic 'but it was on sale!' defense versus the 'we didn't need a Ferrari to go to the grocery store' rebuttal. To identify the point at issue, look for the statement that one person would say 'yes' to and the other would say 'no' to—specifically regarding whether the purchase was appropriate for the school's actual needs.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

15.

The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Sanchez and Merriweather disagree over whether the school

Correct Answer
C
C captures the core disagreement: Sanchez denies that too much was spent overall; Merriweather’s “too elaborate for needs” implies the school did spend more than it should have.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep