Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A scientist points out that lab animals live very sedentary, well-fed lives, which might make them poor subjects for health studies that assume the animals start off in a normal, healthy state.

Conclusion: The conditions under which laboratory animals are kept can negatively impact the accuracy of research results.

Reasoning: Research subjects are assumed to be healthy, but lab animals typically have high food intake and low exercise, and caloric restriction studies specifically assume subjects were not previously overfed.

Analysis: The argument hinges on a gap between the lifestyle of lab animals (overfed and sedentary) and the requirement for research (healthy subjects). For the scientist's conclusion to work, there must be a link between these lifestyle factors and a lack of health. We should look for an answer that suggests animals with ample food and little exercise are not truly healthy. If these animals could be both overfed and healthy, the research results wouldn't necessarily be 'skewed' as the scientist claims.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

6.

The scientist's argument requires assuming which one of the following?

Correct Answer
B
B is correct. It states the needed link: lab conditions with ample food and little exercise can be unhealthy. Negation test: If such conditions cannot be unhealthy, then assuming health wouldn’t be problematic, and the claim that results are skewed would fail.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep