Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: The journalist claims the mayor isn't introspective because he speaks with such unwavering confidence.

Conclusion: The new mayor is not a person who engages in self-reflection.

Reasoning: The mayor makes statements with absolute confidence and total certainty.

Analysis: The journalist is making a big leap from how someone speaks to how their mind works. To make this argument stick, the journalist must assume that being introspective is actually incompatible with speaking with utter certainty. If an introspective person could still project total confidence, the evidence provided wouldn't prove the mayor lacks introspection. Look for an answer that bridges this gap between outward confidence and internal self-reflection.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the journalist's argument?

Correct Answer
A
Correct. If introspective people do not make assertions with utter certainty and confidence, then the mayor’s making such assertions supports the conclusion that he is not introspective. Negation test: If introspective people can make such assertions, the evidence no longer shows he isn’t introspective, and the argument fails—so A is necessary.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep