Point at IssueDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Lyle says updating old plays helps students learn history by making the plays easier to enjoy. Carl disagrees, saying that because the updates lose the original meaning, they are useless for history.

Reasoning: Lyle thinks accessibility makes it valuable for history; Carl thinks the loss of deep historical context makes it worthless for history.

Analysis: Use the Agree/Disagree test here. Lyle says modernizing is valuable for teaching history. Carl explicitly says it is of 'no use' for teaching history. Their clash is centered on whether modernizing language provides any historical educational value. Lyle focuses on the 'hook' of accessibility, while Carl focuses on the 'substance' of historical accuracy.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

20.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses a point of disagreement between Lyle and Carl?

Correct Answer
D
D captures their core dispute: whether making premodern plays more accessible through modernized language is valuable for teaching history. Lyle says yes; Carl says no (indeed, of no use).
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep