Point at IssueDiff: Easy
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: Albert thinks a poorly written book is still useful because it gets scientists working. Yvonne thinks that is a silly argument, comparing the book to a virus that forces doctors to study it.
Conclusion: Albert believes the book is valuable for its scientific impact, while Yvonne believes it lacks value.
Reasoning: Albert argues the book is valuable because it prompted new research; Yvonne counters with an analogy suggesting that causing a reaction does not equate to being beneficial.
Analysis: This is a Point at Issue question, so we need to find the specific claim where one person says 'yes' and the other says 'no.' Albert explicitly states the book is 'valuable,' whereas Yvonne's sarcastic analogy about a virus implies she strongly disagrees with that characterization. Their disagreement centers on whether stimulating activity or research is enough to make a work 'valuable' despite its flaws. Look for an answer choice that directly addresses the 'value' of the book.
Conclusion: Albert believes the book is valuable for its scientific impact, while Yvonne believes it lacks value.
Reasoning: Albert argues the book is valuable because it prompted new research; Yvonne counters with an analogy suggesting that causing a reaction does not equate to being beneficial.
Analysis: This is a Point at Issue question, so we need to find the specific claim where one person says 'yes' and the other says 'no.' Albert explicitly states the book is 'valuable,' whereas Yvonne's sarcastic analogy about a virus implies she strongly disagrees with that characterization. Their disagreement centers on whether stimulating activity or research is enough to make a work 'valuable' despite its flaws. Look for an answer choice that directly addresses the 'value' of the book.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage2.The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Albert and Yvonne disagree over whether
Correct Answer
C
Albert explicitly says the book is valuable; Yvonne’s virus analogy rejects that criterion for value, so she implicitly denies the book is valuable on those grounds. Thus they disagree on whether the book should be considered valuable.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal