Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Bees are dying from various pests and chemicals, but the author argues that the real hidden problem is that they've been bred so much for work that they lack the genetic variety to survive these threats.

Conclusion: Inbreeding is likely a significant, long-overlooked factor contributing to the current decline in honeybee populations.

Reasoning: While immediate causes like mites and pesticides are devastating, decades of breeding for efficiency have reduced genetic diversity, creating an underlying vulnerability.

Analysis: The argument identifies a correlation between breeding practices and population decline, then posits a causal link. For this to hold, the author must assume that limited genetic diversity actually makes the bees more susceptible to the 'immediate' causes mentioned, like mites or viruses. If inbreeding had no effect on their ability to handle these stressors, the conclusion would lose its foundation. Look for an answer that connects the lack of genetic diversity to a decreased ability to withstand environmental or biological attacks.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

3.

Which one of the following is an assumption that is required by the argument?

Correct Answer
E
E is necessary: if lack of genetic diversity did NOT make bees more vulnerable to adverse conditions, then inbreeding couldn’t be an underlying driver of the decline. Negation test: “Lack of genetic diversity does not increase vulnerability” → the argument falls apart.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep