WeakenDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Kids who took a chess class got better grades in all their other subjects, so researchers think the brain power they used for chess helped them in school generally.

Conclusion: The mental skills used in chess, such as reasoning and spatial intuition, likely improve performance in other academic areas.

Reasoning: A study showed that children who finished an experimental chess program experienced a notable increase in their overall school achievement.

Analysis: This argument falls into the classic trap of assuming correlation implies causation. The researchers see two things happening—chess and better grades—and assume the first caused the second. To weaken this, we need to find an alternative explanation for the grade boost. Perhaps only the most motivated students finished the 'experimental' program, or maybe the extra attention from researchers is what actually improved their performance. A great way to undermine this is to suggest that the kids were already on an upward trajectory or that the program attracted students who were already high achievers.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

21.

Which one of the following, if true, most tends to undermine the argument?

Correct Answer
C
If many completers sought membership on a chess team that required a high grade average, that gives them a strong extrinsic reason to boost grades after the program. Their improvement would then be plausibly explained by the GPA requirement, not by chess-trained reasoning/spatial intuition. This undercuts the argument’s causal explanation.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep