StrengthenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Proponents say new drilling technology is clean, but the author points to a nearby site where drilling left the land covered in roads and pipelines to prove them wrong.

Conclusion: The claim that modern drilling methods will prevent environmental damage in the Cape Simmons Nature Preserve is false.

Reasoning: Evidence from nearby Alphin Bay shows that drilling resulted in significant environmental degradation, including industrial sprawl and extensive road networks.

Analysis: To strengthen this argument, we need to bolster the comparison between Alphin Bay and the proposed project at Cape Simmons. The argument is vulnerable if the 'modern methods' mentioned by supporters are significantly different or cleaner than those used at Alphin Bay five years ago. Look for an answer that suggests the damage seen at Alphin Bay is an unavoidable consequence of drilling, regardless of the specific technology used, or that Alphin Bay actually used the same 'modern' methods being proposed now.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

3.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the editorial?

Correct Answer
D
If there have been no significant changes in drilling methods in the last five years, Alphin Bay’s drilling was done with modern methods, making its environmental damage strong evidence against the supporters’ claim.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep