Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Some think the government likes free speech because they allowed a protest, but the government actually agreed with those protesters. Real free speech support is only proven when you let people say things you hate.

Conclusion: The government does not actually support the freedom of popular expression.

Reasoning: True support for free expression requires accepting ideas the government opposes, but the government only accepted a rally that promoted ideas it already supports.

Analysis: The political scientist defines a necessary condition for supporting free expression: one must accept ideas they oppose. The argument then points out that the government hasn't met this condition *in this specific instance*. However, to conclude the government 'supports no such thing' generally, the author must assume the government hasn't accepted opposing ideas in other instances. Look for an answer that addresses the government's behavior regarding ideas it actually dislikes; the argument needs it to be true that the government doesn't accept those.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

Which one of the following is an assumption that is required by the political scientist's argument?

Correct Answer
C
C is necessary. If we negate it—suppose the government would accept a protest rally whose message it opposes—then the fact it accepted this pro-government rally would be consistent with supporting freedom of popular expression, and the scientist’s conclusion (“supports no such thing”) would no longer follow. Thus, C is required for the argument.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep