WeakenDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Mice on ginkgo did better on memory tests, but the author thinks it's because the ginkgo calmed them down, not because it actually boosted their brainpower.

Conclusion: Ginkgo extract might improve memory indirectly by reducing stress rather than by directly enhancing cognitive function.

Reasoning: While ginkgo-fed mice showed better memory, ginkgo is known to lower stress, and lower stress is already known to improve recall.

Analysis: The author is trying to replace one cause (direct memory boost) with another (stress reduction). To weaken this, we need to show that the stress reduction wasn't the actual factor in this specific experiment. For example, if the mice in this study weren't stressed to begin with, the stress-reduction explanation falls apart. Look for an answer that disconnects the stress-reduction benefit from the mice's performance.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?

Correct Answer
B
If neither group showed physiological signs of higher-than-normal stress, then the pathway “ginkgo reduces very high stress → improved recall” is unavailable. That undermines the alternative explanation and makes a direct memory effect more plausible.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep