StrengthenDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Many distant planets have oval orbits, unlike our circular ones. Since comets in our system get oval orbits from getting too close to planets, maybe those distant planets got their oval orbits the same way—by getting too close to other planets.

Conclusion: Some planets with oval orbits around distant stars were likely pushed into those shapes by interactions with other planets in their systems.

Reasoning: In our own solar system, many comets have been forced into oval orbits due to close encounters with planets.

Analysis: The astronomer is using an analogy between comets and planets to explain orbital shapes. To strengthen this, we need to make the comparison more robust or provide evidence that the necessary conditions for this 'pushing' exist elsewhere. An answer that suggests these distant stars typically have multiple planets would be very helpful, as you can't have a 'close encounter' with another planet if there isn't one there. Alternatively, look for an answer that confirms the physics of orbital changes works similarly for both small bodies like comets and large bodies like planets.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

15.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the astronomer's argument?

Correct Answer
C
C strengthens by showing that in most cases there is more than one planet orbiting the star, making close encounters between planets plausible and supporting the proposed cause of oval orbits.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep