Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: The author claims that because pianos make noise by hitting things with hammers, they belong in the percussion family, even though they have strings.

Conclusion: The piano is correctly categorized as a percussion instrument rather than a stringed instrument.

Reasoning: Musical instruments are classified based on the mechanical action used to produce sound, and a piano produces sound through the impact of hammers.

Analysis: To identify the conclusion, look for the 'claim' the author is trying to prove, which is signaled here by the word 'so.' The first sentence provides a general rule for classification, and the final sentence provides a factual description of how the piano operates. The middle sentence is the bridge that applies that rule to the specific case of the piano, making it the main point of the argument. Focus strictly on the structural relationship between these statements rather than evaluating if the musicologist is actually right about the piano.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

9.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the musicologist's argument?

Correct Answer
E
E directly states the author’s main claim—based on the stated principle and the piano’s hammer mechanism, it is correct to classify the piano as percussion rather than strings.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep