Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: The author thinks we shouldn't complain about bad leaders because our system put them there; we should focus on fixing the system instead.

Conclusion: Focusing on the personal flaws of political leaders is a pointless distraction.

Reasoning: The real issue is how democratic institutions and procedures allow flawed individuals to reach power in the first place.

Analysis: The argument creates a false choice between looking at the system and looking at the individuals. For the conclusion to hold, the author must assume that studying individual flaws provides no insight into the systemic problems. Look for an answer that bridges this gap, perhaps by suggesting that focusing on individuals does nothing to help us understand or improve the underlying political procedures.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

8.

Which one of the following is an assumption that the argument requires?

Correct Answer
A
If examining leaders’ personal flaws reveals nothing about how institutions and procedures influence selection, then focusing on those flaws would be a distraction from the “real question.” Negating A (that such examination does reveal something) would directly undermine the conclusion, so A is required.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep