Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Back when people thought Earth didn't move, they concluded stars had to be relatively close. Their logic was that if stars were far away, they'd have to move way too fast to get around the Earth in just 24 hours.

Conclusion: The stars were located no more than a few million miles away from Earth.

Reasoning: If Earth is stationary and the stars were further away, they would have to travel at impossibly high speeds to complete a circle around Earth every day.

Analysis: The argument relies on a 'gap' regarding physical limits. It assumes that there is a maximum speed at which stars can travel, or at least a speed that is 'too fast' to be plausible. If stars were capable of moving at any speed, regardless of how 'tremendously great' it was, the distance wouldn't be restricted by the 24-hour timeframe. To find the necessary assumption, look for a choice that suggests these high speeds are actually impossible or that the astronomers were operating under a specific speed limit for celestial bodies.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the reasoning described above?

Correct Answer
D
The argument requires that stars do not move at tremendously great speeds; otherwise, stars could be far away and still complete a daily circuit, undermining the conclusion that they’re nearby.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep