Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: It is almost impossible for oil levels to stay exactly the same for a year because you are always using oil or finding more, so countries saying their levels didn't change are probably lying.

Conclusion: Most nations claiming their oil reserves remained unchanged are likely providing inaccurate information.

Reasoning: Oil reserves naturally fluctuate as fields are depleted and new ones are discovered, making it statistically unlikely for the total to stay exactly the same over a year.

Analysis: The argument assumes that the natural 'ups' and 'downs' of oil reserves won't perfectly balance each other out. If a nation discovered exactly as much oil as it extracted, its reserves would stay the same, and its report would be accurate. Therefore, the argument *needs* to assume that such a perfect coincidence is extremely rare or impossible. To find the necessary assumption, look for a statement that denies the possibility of these fluctuations consistently canceling each other out.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

16.

Which one of the following is an assumption the argument requires?

Correct Answer
B
It supplies the needed link: in most of those nations in 1997, there was at least one change (draining or discovery), making “unchanged” unlikely and supporting that most such reports were incorrect.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep