AgreementDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Jake thinks antibacterial cleaners are great for keeping a home clean, while Karolinka thinks they are dangerous because they help create super-bacteria that resist medicine.

Reasoning: Jake argues that people wanting to minimize household bacteria should use antibacterial cleaners because they kill common bacteria. Karolinka argues that these agents should not be used because they lead to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Analysis: When looking for a point of agreement, we need to find a premise or a fact that both speakers rely upon. Jake explicitly states that these products kill common bacteria. Karolinka bases her warning on the idea that the bacteria which *survive* the products become resistant, which implies she agrees that the products do indeed kill off the non-resistant common bacteria. While they fight over whether we *should* use them, they both seem to accept the basic biological mechanism of how these cleaners interact with common bacteria.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

2.

The discussion above indicates that Jake and Karolinka agree with each other that which one of the following is true?

Correct Answer
A
Both positions presuppose that antibacterial cleaning products kill some common bacteria: Jake states it outright, and Karolinka speaks of the bacteria that survive their use, implying others are killed.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep