Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Scientists know that stress and weak immune systems are linked to cancer. Because support groups help people relax, they might actually help treat the disease.

Conclusion: Support groups for cancer patients may provide legitimate medical benefits.

Reasoning: Weakened immune systems make people more susceptible to cancer, and participating in support groups is known to lower stress.

Analysis: The psychologist is making a significant leap from 'reducing stress' to 'therapeutic value' via the immune system. For this argument to hold water, there must be a functional link between stress levels and the immune system's ability to fight cancer. We are looking for a necessary assumption that bridges this gap—specifically, that reducing stress actually bolsters the immune system or otherwise aids recovery. Without this connection, the fact that groups reduce stress would be medically irrelevant to the cancer itself.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the psychologist's argument?

Correct Answer
C
Stress can weaken the immune system is required to connect “support groups reduce stress” to “therapeutic value” via the immunity pathway. Negation test: If stress cannot weaken immunity, then reducing stress would not improve immunity, undermining the argument’s basis.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep