Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Parents think smaller classes help kids learn better because of more one-on-one time, but researchers say this is wrong because grades didn't go up when class sizes were reduced.

Conclusion: The parents' belief that smaller class sizes lead to better learning through increased individual attention is likely incorrect.

Reasoning: A study of schools with reduced class sizes showed that while teachers did spend more time with each student, the students' average grades did not improve.

Analysis: The researchers are treating 'average grades' as the sole, definitive measure of whether students are 'engaged in the learning process.' For their conclusion to hold, they must assume that any increase in learning or engagement would necessarily result in higher grades. If engagement can improve without immediately boosting GPA, the researchers' evidence doesn't actually disprove the parents' theory.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

14.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the researchers' argument?

Correct Answer
D
D supplies the needed bridge: engagement correlates well with grades. Negation test: if engagement does not correlate with grades, then unchanged grades cannot call the parents’ engagement claim into question—so the researchers’ argument fails. Thus D is necessary.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep