WeakenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Because business leaders make massive decisions that shape society and the economy, an economist argues they should be classified as public officials.

Conclusion: Business executives in free market systems have effectively become public officials.

Reasoning: Executives make major decisions regarding industrial technology, work organization, and resource allocation, which are roles typically associated with public governance.

Analysis: The economist's argument relies on a functional similarity: if you make 'public-sized' decisions, you are a 'public' official. To weaken this, we need to find a fundamental difference between a corporate executive and a true public official that the economist is ignoring. For instance, public officials are usually accountable to the electorate or the law in a way that private executives are not, or their primary motivations (profit vs. public good) might be diametrically opposed. Look for an answer that highlights a distinction in accountability, purpose, or the source of their authority.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

10.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the economist's argument?

Correct Answer
B
It directly undercuts the definitional move by stating that the listed decisions are not the core of a public official’s job, weakening the leap from “execs make big decisions” to “execs are public officials.”
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep