WeakenDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Patricia says ninjas weren't a big deal, but Tamara points to 'squeaky floors' built to catch ninjas as proof that people were scared; Patricia now needs to talk her way out of that evidence.

Conclusion: The existence of intentionally squeaky floors does not prove that there was significant ninja activity or widespread fear of ninjas.

Reasoning: Patricia needs to provide a counter-explanation for the floors that doesn't involve a genuine threat from ninjas.

Analysis: Tamara has provided a specific piece of evidence—squeaky floors—to support the idea of ninja-related fear. To weaken Tamara's objection, Patricia needs to show that those floors existed for a different reason or were not as common as Tamara implies. Maybe the floors were just a trendy architectural fad for the super-rich, or they were meant to catch common burglars rather than elite assassins. Look for an answer that provides an alternative cause for the 'nightingale floors' that bypasses the ninja theory.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

6.

Of the following, which one, if true, is the strongest counter Patricia can make to Tamara's objection?

Correct Answer
C
If the wealthy were only a small portion of the population, then ‘many wealthy had squeaky floors’ tells us little about whether most Japanese feared ninjas, preserving Patricia’s point.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep