Passage Summary: Daniel thinks you need to do the right thing for the right reasons for it to be 'good,' but Carrie thinks only the action matters because we can't control how we feel.

Reasoning: Daniel argues that an action is only morally good if it fulfills an obligation and is done with the right motivation. Carrie argues that because we cannot control our motivations, only the fulfillment of an obligation is required for an action to be morally good.

Analysis: To find the point at issue, apply the 'Agree/Disagree' test. Daniel explicitly states that right motivations are a necessary condition for moral goodness. Carrie explicitly rejects this, claiming that *only* fulfilling the obligation is required. They are fundamentally at odds over whether 'right motivation' is a requirement for an action to be considered morally good. Look for an answer choice that captures this specific disagreement.