Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Archaeologists found a clay hippo with broken legs in a tomb. Because Egyptians had a ritual of breaking animal legs to help the dead in the afterlife, the researchers assume this hippo was a ritual tool, not just a toy that happened to break.

Conclusion: The earthenware hippopotamus was intended as a religious item rather than a plaything for a child.

Reasoning: The object was found in a tomb with its legs broken off, and ancient Egyptians believed that breaking the legs of animal figures helped the deceased fight off beasts in the afterlife.

Analysis: The argument assumes that the broken legs weren't just an accident or the result of a child playing too roughly. For the conclusion to hold, there must be a link between the physical state of the object and its intended purpose. We should look for an answer that suggests the legs were broken intentionally for ritualistic reasons, or that toys weren't typically used in this specific religious manner. The 'gap' is the assumption that the damage was a deliberate ritualistic act rather than random wear and tear.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

2.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the curator's argument?

Correct Answer
D
D is necessary. If we negate it—“the legs were broken through some natural occurrence after placement in the tomb”—then the tie between the broken legs and religious ritual disappears, and the conclusion that it was a religious object no longer follows. So the argument depends on D.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep