WeakenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A consultant thinks airlines are wasting time on business class perks and should focus on vacationers instead, simply because vacationers buy way more tickets.

Conclusion: Airlines should prioritize the comfort of leisure travelers over that of business travelers.

Reasoning: Leisure travelers are responsible for purchasing 80 percent of all airline tickets sold.

Analysis: The consultant's reasoning relies on a 'quantity over quality' fallacy. It assumes that the sheer volume of ticket sales is the only metric that matters for business strategy. To weaken this, look for an answer that suggests business travelers are more valuable in other ways—perhaps business class tickets generate the majority of the airline's actual profit, even if they represent a smaller percentage of total seats.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

3.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the reasoning in the travel industry consultant's argument?

Correct Answer
D
If a far greater proportion of revenue comes from business travelers, then focusing on their comfort isn’t an overconcern; it’s a sensible response to where the money is. This undercuts the consultant’s inference from “80% of tickets are leisure” to “comfort focus should be leisure.”
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep