Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Even though having a boss watch you might change how you drive, the company thinks the rankings will stay the same because everyone is being watched equally.

Conclusion: The drivers who perform best while being watched by a supervisor are likely the best drivers under normal, unobserved conditions.

Reasoning: Every driver's performance is affected by the supervisor's presence, so the relative rankings should remain the same.

Analysis: The argument relies on a 'Gap' regarding how the supervisor's presence affects different individuals. It assumes that the 'supervisor effect' is relatively uniform across all drivers. If the presence of a supervisor made a great driver panic and fail, but helped a mediocre driver focus and improve, the rankings would be totally unreliable. To bridge this gap, the argument *needs* to assume that the supervisor's presence doesn't disproportionately benefit or hinder certain drivers in a way that reshuffles the leaderboard.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

6.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Correct Answer
D
The argument needs the assumption that the supervisor’s presence affects all drivers in roughly the same way and to the same extent so that supervised rankings mirror normal rankings. Negation test: if drivers are affected differently, supervised rankings may not match normal rankings, undermining the conclusion.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep